Case Study Archive -

Sentiment and Emotion Detection for Social LLMs

Harshit — Wed, 21 Aug 2024 04:48:07 +0000

Sentiment and Emotion Detection for Social LLMs

Project Overview:

Objective

The goal was to develop a dataset that improves LLMs’ empathy and response accuracy by annotating social media posts with both sentiment and specific emotions.

Scope

The dataset encompassed a wide range of social media posts from platforms like Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram, representing diverse topics and emotional tones. The posts were annotate to capture both the sentiment (positive, negative, neutral) and specific emotions (e.g., happiness, anger, sadness).

Sources

Social Media Platforms: 80,000 posts were collected from Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram, ensuring a broad representation of emotions and sentiments across different contexts and user interactions.
Diverse Topics and Emotional Tones: The dataset included posts on various topics, ensuring that the LLMs could understand and respond to a wide range of emotional cues.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Posts Collected: 80,000 social media posts.
Emotion Tags Added: 240,000 emotion tags (3 emotions per post), encompassing a wide spectrum of emotional states.

Annotation Process

Stages

Sentiment Analysis: Annotators identify and label each post with the underlying sentiment (positive, negative, neutral).
Emotion Detection: Specific emotions such as happiness, anger, sadness, and others were identified and label, providing nuanced emotional context for each post.

Annotation Metrics

Sentiments Annotated: All 80,000 posts were label with their corresponding sentiment.
Emotions Tagged: 240,000 emotion tags were applied across the dataset, capturing the complex emotional content in the posts.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Continuous Model Testing: The dataset was very meticulously validate as to if it is really contributing to the model’s emotional sensing and response improvement.
Annotator Expertise: A team of 45 annotators with backgrounds in psychology and social media analysis ensured high-quality and consistent annotations.
Improvement Process: Feedback loops were established to refine the annotation process and improve the quality of the dataset over time.

QA Metrics

Emotion Detection Accuracy: The dataset significantly improve the LLM’s ability to detect emotions with high accuracy, resulting in more empathetic and appropriate responses in customer support applications.
Sentiment Analysis Accuracy: The LLMs trained on this dataset achieved. A high accuracy rate in identifying and responding to different sentiments in social media posts.
Annotation Consistency: The annotation process maintain a high level of consistency across. The 80,000 posts, ensuring reliable training data for the LLMs.

Conclusion

The creation of this sentiment and emotion detection dataset represents. A significant advancement in improving LLMs’ ability to understand and respond to emotional content. This dataset enhances the LLMs’ empathy and contextual understanding. Making them more effective in applications such as customer support and social media interactions.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Sentiment and Emotion Detection for Social LLMs appeared first on .

Code Commenting and Explanation for LLM-based Coders

Harshit — Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:47:11 +0000

Code Commenting and Explanation for LLM-based Coders

Project Overview:

Objective

The goal was to develop a dataset that would enhance LLMs’ understanding of code logic, functions, and potential edge cases, thereby improving their utility in generating high-quality code comments and explanations for developers.

Scope

The dataset includes a diverse collection of code snippets from various programming languages and domains. Each snippet is annotated with detail explanations covering the logic, functionality, and potential edge cases, providing the LLM with the context needed to generate accurate and helpful comments.

Sources

Code Collection: A total of 100,000 code snippets were collect from a variety of programming languages and domains, ensuring broad coverage of coding practices and use cases.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Code Snippets Collected: 100,000 code snippets.
Explanations Provided: 100,000 detailed explanations, with an average length of 50 words per explanation.

Annotation Process

Stages

Expert Annotations: A team of 50 annotators with expertise in software development provided detail explanations for each code snippet. These explanations cover the logic, functionality, and potential edge cases to ensure comprehensive understanding.
Contextual Relevance: Annotations were design to be contextually relevant, helping the LLM grasp the nuances of each code snippet and generate appropriate comments.

Annotation Metrics

Team Involvement: A team of 50 annotators, all experience software developers and engineers, work over a period of 4 months to complete the project.
Total Annotations: 100,000 explanations were provided, ensuring that each code snippet was thoroughly explained.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Annotation Accuracy: Rigorous quality checks were implemented to ensure that the explanations were accurate, detailed, and contextually appropriate.
Consistency Reviews: Regular reviews were conducted to maintain consistency across all annotations, ensuring that the dataset was reliable and effective for training LLMs.

QA Metrics

Explanation Accuracy: High accuracy was achieved in providing detailed and contextually relevant explanations for each code snippet.
Consistency in Annotations: The dataset maintained a high level of consistency across annotations, contributing to the reliability of the LLM’s training data.

Conclusion

The creation of this code commenting and explanation dataset significantly enhanced the ability of LLMs to understand and generate accurate code explanations. This improvement has proven valuable for developers, enabling more effective use of LLM-base coding tools and improving the quality of auto-generate code comments.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Code Commenting and Explanation for LLM-based Coders appeared first on .

Conversational Context Understanding for LLM-based Chatbots

Harshit — Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:49:27 +0000

Conversational Context Understanding for LLM-based Chatbots

Project Overview:

Objective

The goal was to develop a dataset that would train and evaluate LLMs in understanding and retaining conversational context over long interactions, thereby enhancing the naturalness and engagement of chatbot responses.

Scope

The dataset includes synthetic multi-turn conversations across a range of scenarios, such as customer support, casual chatting, and information retrieval. Each conversation is annotate to highlight key context points and conversational shifts, aiding the LLM in maintaining context.

Sources

Synthetic Data Generation: The data was generated through 50,000 synthetic conversations, crafted by conversational AI experts to simulate real-world interactions.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Conversations Generate: 50,000 synthetic multi-turn conversations.
Context Points Identify: 150,000 context points were identify and annotate (averaging 3 per conversation).

Annotation Process

Stages

Contextual Analysis: Annotators with expertise in linguistics and conversational AI analyze each conversation to identify key context points, conversational shifts, and relevance.
Context Retention: The annotations were design to help the LLM understand and retain context, ensuring more coherent and contextually appropriate responses.

Annotation Metrics

Team Involvement: A team of 40 annotators, specializing in linguistics and conversational AI, work over a period of 3 months to complete the project.
Total Annotations: 150,000 annotations were made, focusing on context points and conversational flow.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Annotation Accuracy: Rigorous checks were perform to ensure that context points were accurately identify and annotate, and that conversational shifts were clearly marked.
Consistency Reviews: Regular reviews were conduct to maintain consistency across all annotated conversations.

QA Metrics

Context Retention Accuracy: The dataset achieved high accuracy in correctly identifying and maintaining context across extend conversations.
Conversational Flow Accuracy: Annotations accurately reflect the conversational flow, enhancing the LLM’s ability to provide natural and engaging responses.

Conclusion

The development of this conversational context dataset significantly improve the ability of LLM-based chatbots to handle extend dialogues. As a result, the chatbots now offer more coherent and contextually relevant interactions, enhancing user experience across various applications.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Conversational Context Understanding for LLM-based Chatbots appeared first on .

Recipe Annotation for Food & Beverage LLM

Harshit — Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:04:18 +0000

Recipe Annotation for Food & Beverage LLM

Project Overview:

Objective

The goal was to create a detail dataset that enhances LLMs’ ability to interpret culinary content, including the identification of ingredients and the sequencing of cooking instructions. This would enable more accurate and useful AI-driven applications in the culinary space.

Scope

The dataset encompasses a wide range of recipes from various cuisines and dietary preferences. Each recipe is meticulously annotate to ensure the clear identification of ingredients and cooking steps, facilitating the development of advanced LLM capabilities in the food and beverage domain.

Sources

Online Recipe Platforms: Data was source from 15,000 recipes collect from diverse online platforms, covering a broad spectrum of cuisines and dietary needs.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Recipes Collect: 15,000 recipes.
Ingredients Tagged: 75,000 ingredients identify and tag (averaging 5 per recipe).
Instructions Annotate: 75,000 cooking instructions were annotate to ensure clarity and proper sequence (averaging 5 per recipe).

Annotation Process

Stages

Ingredient Identification: Annotators, including culinary experts, meticulously tagged each ingredient within the recipes to ensure precise identification.
Instruction Sequencing: Cooking steps were annotated to maintain the correct sequence, aiding in accurate recipe interpretation and execution by LLMs.

Annotation Metrics

Team Involvement: A team of 30 annotators, including culinary experts, work over a span of 2 months to complete the project.
Total Annotations: 150,000 annotations were made, encompassing both ingredients and cooking instructions.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Annotation Accuracy: Rigorous checks were implement to ensure that ingredients and instructions were correctly annotate and that the sequence of steps was logical and consistent.
Culinary Expertise: Involvement of culinary experts ensure that the annotations were not only accurate but also contextually appropriate for various cuisines.

QA Metrics

Ingredient Identification Accuracy: High accuracy was achieved in correctly tagging ingredients across all recipes.
Instruction Sequencing Accuracy: The cooking steps were accurately annotate and sequenced, contributing to the dataset’s overall quality and utility.

Conclusion

The creation of this recipe annotation dataset significantly improve the capabilities of LLMs in understanding and processing culinary information. The dataset has proven to be a valuable resource in the development of AI-driven cooking assistants and tools for dietary analysis, enhancing the user experience in the food and beverage industry.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Recipe Annotation for Food & Beverage LLM appeared first on .

Customer Feedback Analysis for Financial Services LLM

Harshit — Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:54:18 +0000

Customer Feedback Analysis for Financial Services LLM

Project Overview:

Objective

The goal was to build a comprehensive dataset of customer feedback, annotated for sentiment and topic, to improve the accuracy of LLMs in analyzing sentiment and categorizing customer support issues in financial services.

Scope

The dataset includes both structure and unstructure customer feedback from financial service providers, including banks and insurance companies. The feedback was annotate for sentiment and categorize by topic to ensure precise analysis by LLMs.

Sources

Customer Feedback Collection: The data was sourced from 30,000 feedback entries provided by customers of various financial services, including both banks and insurance firms.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Feedback Entries: 30,000 feedback entries were collected.
Sentiment Tags: Each feedback entry was annotated with 3 sentiment tags (positive, negative, or neutral).

Annotation Process

Stages

Sentiment Classification: Annotators classified the feedback into three categories: positive, negative, or neutral.
Topic Categorization: Feedback was also categorized by topics relevant to financial services, such as account management, loan services, and customer support.

Annotation Metrics

Total Sentiment Annotations: 30,000 sentiment tags were applied.
Team Involvement: 35 annotators worked on the project over a duration of 1 month.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Annotation Accuracy: Continuous checks were performed to ensure that sentiment and topic annotations were accurate and aligned with the feedback content.
Consistency Checks: Regular reviews were conducted to maintain consistent tagging across all entries.

QA Metrics

Sentiment Accuracy: The project achieved a high accuracy rate in correctly identifying customer sentiment across feedback entries.
Topic Classification Accuracy: The feedback was accurately categorized by topic, enhancing the relevance of responses generated by LLMs.

Conclusion

The creation of this dataset marked a significant improvement in the ability of LLMs to analyze customer sentiment and support issues within the financial services industry. By accurately interpreting customer feedback, the dataset has contributed to better automated customer service responses and increased customer satisfaction.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Customer Feedback Analysis for Financial Services LLM appeared first on .

Medical Record Annotation for Healthcare LLM

Harshit — Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:44:03 +0000

Medical Record Annotation for Healthcare LLM

Project Overview:

Objective

The objective of this project was to develop a comprehensive dataset that improves the understanding and interpretation of medical terminology and patient records by LLMs, thereby aiding in more accurate AI-driven healthcare applications.

Scope

The scope of the project included the annotation of anonymized patient records from various healthcare institutions. The focus was on tagging key medical terms, diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes to create a robust dataset for training and evaluating LLMs in medical contexts.

Sources

Anonymized Patient Records: The project sourced 10,000 anonymized patient records from multiple healthcare institutions, ensuring a diverse and representative dataset for medical LLMs.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Records Annotated: 10,000 patient records were annotated.
Medical Terms Tagged: 150,000 medical terms, diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes were identified and tagged across the records, averaging 15 annotations per record.

Annotation Process

Stages

Medical Expertise: A team of 60 annotators with medical backgrounds participated in the project to ensure accurate and contextually relevant annotations.
Key Annotations: Annotators tagged critical medical terms, including diagnoses, treatments, and patient outcomes, within the records.

Annotation Metrics

Total Records Annotated: 10,000 patient records.
Medical Terms Tagged: 150,000 annotations covering key medical concepts.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Expert Review: Continuous review and validation by medical experts were conducted to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the annotations.
Data Integrity: Strict adherence to privacy regulations was maintained to ensure the anonymization and protection of patient information throughout the project.

QA Metrics

Annotation Accuracy: High accuracy in tagging medical terms and concepts, contributing to the overall quality of the dataset.
Privacy Compliance: Full compliance with data protection and privacy regulations, ensuring the ethical use of medical records.

Conclusion

The Medical Record Annotation for Healthcare LLM project is a big leap forward in the application of AI in the health sector. The project, by developing a complete and precise annotated dataset, has become a stepping stone for LLMs to be able to recognize and decipher medical records and, thus, accomplish better AI-driven healthcare solutions.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Medical Record Annotation for Healthcare LLM appeared first on .

Product Categorization for Retail LLM

Harshit — Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:40:59 +0000

Product Categorization for Retail LLM

Home » Case Study

Project Overview:

Objective

The goal is to build a comprehensive dataset that enables LLMs to accurately understand and categorize a wide variety of retail products, improving the user experience in e-commerce platforms.

Scope

The dataset includes diverse product descriptions across multiple retail categories such as electronics, fashion, and home goods. The categorization aims to ensure that products are easily searchable and recommendation accurately base on user preferences.

Sources

Online Retail Platforms: Product descriptions were sourced from various online retail platforms, covering a wide range of categories.
Category Annotation: The descriptions were systematically categorized into predefined categories to enhance consistency and relevance in product categorization.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Product Descriptions Collect: 50,000 product descriptions.
Categories Annotated: 100,000 annotations, with each product categorized into two distinct categories.

Annotation Process

Stages

Category Assignment: Each product description was analyzed and assigned to one of 100 predefined categories. This dual categorization was implemented to improve the LLM’s ability to understand and classify products with greater accuracy.
Consistency Checks: Regular checks were conducted to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the assigned categories.

Annotation Metrics

Total Categories Annotated: 100,000 categories, with a dual categorization approach applied to each product.
Annotator Team Size: A team of 40 annotators collaborated on the project.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Consistency Validation: Continuous validation processes were in place to ensure that the annotations were accurate and consistent with the predefined categories.
Data Relevance: The dataset was regularly review to ensure that it remain relevant to the evolving needs of online retail platforms.
Duration: The project was complete within 2 months, ensuring timely delivery while maintaining high-quality standards.

QA Metrics

Categorization Accuracy: The project achieve a high categorization accuracy, ensuring that products were correctly classify into relevant categories.
Relevance Check: Continuous feedback was incorporate to improve the relevance and accuracy of the dataset.
Timeliness: The project was completed within the planned time frame of 2 months, ensuring no delays in deployment.

Conclusion

The creation of this comprehensive dataset marks a significant advancement in the ability of LLMs to categorize retail products accurately. This enhancement directly contributes to better search accuracy and more relevant product recommendations in e-commerce platforms, ultimately improving the user experience.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Product Categorization for Retail LLM appeared first on .

Interactive Preference Collection for Conversational AI

Harshit — Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:14:58 +0000

Interactive Preference Collection for Conversational AI

Home » Case Study

Project Overview:

Objective

The objective was to gather a vast dataset comprising multi-turn conversations and preference rankings, which would help improve the conversational AI models’ ability to generate contextually appropriate and user-preferred responses.

Scope

The dataset collected contained multiple turns in conversations, with detailed evaluations and rankings of AI-generated responses. This scope ensured that the AI models were exposed to diverse conversational contexts and user preferences.

Sources

Conversation Generation: Annotators initiated or continued conversations based on provided instructions, generating prompts for the AI agents.
Response Evaluation: Annotators evaluated and ranked two AI-generated responses per turn, determining the preferred response or noting if they were tied.
Quality Scoring: Annotators provided overall quality scores for both responses in each turn.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Tasks: 1,300,000 tasks, each with 5 turns, totaling 6,500,000 turns.
Language: English (enUS)
Skills: Creation + Annotation, Writing

Annotation Process

Stages

Conversation Initiation and Continuation: Annotators created conversation prompts or continued existing ones based on provided instructions.
Response Ranking: For each conversation turn, annotators received two AI-generated responses, which they ranked based on preference.
Quality Scoring: Annotators assigned quality scores to both responses in each turn to ensure consistency and accuracy.

Annotation Metrics

Total Conversations Evaluated: 1,300,000 conversations.
Total Turns Evaluated: 6,500,000 turns.
Preference Rankings: Detailed rankings were provided for each turn to determine which AI response was preferred.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Continuous Evaluation: The dataset was continuously evaluated to maintain high standards of quality and relevance.
Skill Requirements: Annotators with advanced English proficiency and prior annotation experience were selected for the task to ensure accurate and high-quality data.
Feedback and Improvement: Regular feedback was incorporated to refine the conversation generation and evaluation process.

QA Metrics

Accuracy in Preference Ranking: Annotators successfully ranked responses with high accuracy, ensuring that the dataset reflected genuine user preferences.
Consistency in Quality Scoring: Quality scores were assigned consistently across all turns, maintaining the reliability of the dataset.

Conclusion

The creation of this extensive dataset, with 6.5 million multi-turn conversations and accompanying preference rankings, significantly advanced the training and evaluation of conversational AI models. The dataset provided rich insights into user preferences, enabling AI models to generate more natural, engaging, and contextually appropriate responses, thus enhancing the overall conversational experience.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Interactive Preference Collection for Conversational AI appeared first on .

Image Description for Generative AI

Harshit — Sat, 17 Aug 2024 09:30:41 +0000

Image Description for Generative AI

Home » Case Study

Project Overview:

Objective

The aim was to produce a comprehensive dataset of 100,000 images paired with rich textual descriptions. This dataset was intended to advance the AI’s proficiency in generating accurate and descriptive image-to-text outputs, thus facilitating more precise and context-aware AI applications.

Scope

The dataset included a wide range of images sourced from various environments and contexts. Each image was accompanied by a detailed textual description, capturing relevant details, contextual information, and potential use cases.

Sources

Online Image Collection: A diverse collection of 100,000 images was curated from various online sources, ensuring a wide representation of scenarios.
In-House Image Creation: Additional images were created in-house to fill specific gaps and enhance the diversity of the dataset.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Images Collected: 100,000 images, including both source and self-created.
Textual Descriptions: 100,000 detailed descriptions were annotated, one per image, with an average length of 100 words.

Annotation Process

Stages

Contextual Descriptions: Annotators provided rich textual descriptions for each image, highlighting relevant details, contextual information, and potential applications.
Detail Capture: The descriptions were crafted to capture the intricate relationships between visual elements and their textual representations, ensuring comprehensive coverage.

Annotation Metrics

Images Annotated: 100,000 images received detailed descriptions.
Average Description Length: Each description averaged 100 words, ensuring sufficient detail and context.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Annotation Accuracy: Continuous review and feedback loops were implemented to maintain high standards of description accuracy and relevance.
Consistency Checks: Regular checks were conducted to ensure uniformity in the style and depth of the descriptions across the entire dataset.
Improvement Process: Feedback from the model’s performance was used to refine and improve the annotation process.

QA Metrics

Description Accuracy: The project achieved a high level of accuracy in capturing the intended details and contexts within each image description.
Consistency Rating: The consistency of annotations across the dataset was maintained at a high standard, ensuring uniform quality.
Feedback Utilization: Continuous improvements were made based on feedback, enhancing the overall quality of the dataset.

Conclusion

The creation of the 100,000-image dataset with detailed textual descriptions represents a significant advancement in the training of Generative AI models. This dataset serves as a crucial resource for improving image-to-text generation, enabling the development of more accurate and context-aware AI applications.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Image Description for Generative AI appeared first on .

Question and Answer Annotation

Harshit — Sat, 17 Aug 2024 05:59:43 +0000

Question and Answer Annotation

Home » Case Study

Project Overview:

Objective

The primary objective was to build a dataset that could effectively enhance the question-answering capabilities of LLMs across various domains by providing them with high-quality, annotate articles, questions, and answers.

Scope

The dataset enclose a bunch of matters, like news, education, and company policies. It is made to reproduce real-life question-answering circumstances, offering an overall resource for LLMs training to comprehend and generate exact responses.

Sources

Synthetic Articles: A dedicate team of content writers generate 20,000 synthetic articles covering multiple categories like news, education, company policies, and more.
Non-Synthetic Articles: The project also included real articles sourced from various credible platforms to add diversity and realism to the dataset.

Data Collection Metrics

Total Articles Generated: 20,000 articles were created and sourced.
Questions Annotated: 100,000 questions were formulated based on article summaries.

Annotation Process

Stages

Question Annotation: A specialized team of annotators accessed article summaries to frame five questions per article, resulting in 100,000 questions. These questions were designed to test the model’s ability to understand and generate accurate responses.
Answer Annotation: Another team of annotators, with access to the full articles, provided precise answers to each question and marked the relevant paragraphs where the answers were found. This ensured that the dataset was not only comprehensive but also aligned with real-world applications.

Annotation Metrics

Total Questions Annotated: 100,000 questions were annotated, ensuring each article had a corresponding set of questions to train LLMs effectively.
Total Answers Annotated: 100,000 answers were annotated, with accurate paragraph markings to enhance the training quality for LLMs.

Quality Assurance

Stages

Accuracy and Consistency: Throughout the project, continuous checks and model testing were performed to maintain high levels of accuracy in both question formulation and answer annotation.
Data Integrity: Strict protocols were followed to ensure that all annotations were consistent, reliable, and accurately reflected the content of the articles.
Feedback Loop: A feedback system was implemented to improve the dataset continuously based on preliminary testing and model performance.

QA Metrics

Question Framing Accuracy: The accuracy of the questions framed based on article summaries was maintained at a high standard, ensuring relevance and clarity.
Answer Precision: The precision in marking the correct paragraphs for the answers was rigorously checked, achieving a high level of accuracy.

Conclusion

The creation of this extensive dataset, with 20,000 articles, 100,000 questions, and 100,000 annotated answers, marks a significant advancement in the training and evaluation of LLMs for question-answering tasks. This dataset provides a rich resource for improving the performance of LLMs across a wide range of topics, making them more capable of understanding and responding to questions in real-world scenarios.

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

To get a detailed estimation of requirements please reach us.

The post Question and Answer Annotation appeared first on .

Case Study Archive -

Sentiment and Emotion Detection for Social LLMs

Sentiment and Emotion Detection for Social LLMs

Project Overview:

Objective

Scope

Sources

Data Collection Metrics

Annotation Process

Stages

Annotation Metrics

Quality Assurance

Stages

QA Metrics

Conclusion

Quality Data Creation

Guaranteed TAT

ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Certified

HIPAA Compliance

GDPR Compliance

Compliance and Security

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

Code Commenting and Explanation for LLM-based Coders

Code Commenting and Explanation for LLM-based Coders

Project Overview:

Objective

Scope

Sources

Data Collection Metrics

Annotation Process

Stages

Annotation Metrics

Quality Assurance

Stages

QA Metrics

Conclusion

Quality Data Creation

Guaranteed TAT

ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Certified

HIPAA Compliance

GDPR Compliance

Compliance and Security

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

Conversational Context Understanding for LLM-based Chatbots

Conversational Context Understanding for LLM-based Chatbots

Project Overview:

Objective

Scope

Sources

Data Collection Metrics

Annotation Process

Stages

Annotation Metrics

Quality Assurance

Stages

QA Metrics

Conclusion

Quality Data Creation

Guaranteed TAT

ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Certified

HIPAA Compliance

GDPR Compliance

Compliance and Security

Let's Discuss your Data collection Requirement With Us

Recipe Annotation for Food & Beverage LLM

Recipe Annotation for Food & Beverage LLM

Project Overview:

Objective

Scope

Sources

Data Collection Metrics

Annotation Process

Stages

Annotation Metrics

Quality Assurance

Stages

QA Metrics

Conclusion

Quality Data Creation

Guaranteed TAT